Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mandiberns.com

Mandi Berns — Author of Collision Course · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
rebeccahprince.com
Rebeccah Prince — Author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
juliejames.com
Julie James | Bestselling Author of Contemporary Romance
1 shared topicsromance
69match
aubreywhitten.com
Aubrey Whitten | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
68match
lornarosewellauthor.com
Lorna Rosewell, Contemporary Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
67match
candisterry.com
Candis Terry, Contemporary Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
67match
abloren.com
A.B. Loren | Author of Contemporary and Clean Romances
1 shared topicsromance
67match
aubreycullens.com
Aubrey Cullens – M/M Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
67match
annroth.net
Contemporary Romance Author Ann Roth
1 shared topicsromance
67match
jroseblack.com
J Rose Black, Author of new adult sports romance
1 shared topicsromance
67match
rebeccavalli.com
Rebecca Valli — Author
1 shared topicsromance
67match
courtbehr.com
Court Behr - Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
67match
holliedelaney.com
Author Hollie Delaney
1 shared topicsromance
67match
juliehaworth.com
Award-winning author Julie Haworth writes contemporary romance novels.
1 shared topicsromance
66match
elainelindsey.com
HOME | Author E.M. Lindsey
1 shared topicsromance
66match
annjensenwrites.com
Ann Jensen – Author of amazing romance novels
1 shared topicsromance
66match
annmariesprings.com
AnnMarie Springs Author
1 shared topicsromance
66match
hopecarterbooks.com
Hope Carter Books – small-town romance author
1 shared topicsromance
66match
julesackwood.com
Home | Jules Ackwood | Contemporary romance author
1 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.