Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mandeeya.io

Mandeeya · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
cameronpanderson.com
Cameron Anderson
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
anip.me
Hi! - Home
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
pabloescandell.com
Pablo Escandell
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
hnieb.com
Max Hniebergall - Senior Software Engineer & AI/ML Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
hniebergall.com
Max Hniebergall - Senior Software Engineer & AI/ML Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
bugraozkan.net
Bugra Ozkan
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
akulgokaram.dev
Akul Gokaram | Full Stack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
hollygrimm.com
Holly Grimm
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
aniruddhsriram.com
Aniruddh Sriram
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
furkanhalici.com
Furkan Halici – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
asykim.com
Andrew Sy Kim
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
aapeli.org
Aapeli Vuorinen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
juliekristen.com
Julie Kristen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
albertzhang.dev
Albert Zhang
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
alexgkendall.com
Alex Kendall
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
abduh.me
Abdulelah Bin Mahfoodh
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
eddiechen.dev
Eddie Chen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
junjuewang.com
Junjue (Jay) Wang | Personal Website
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.