Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to mananyte.com

ManaNyte · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
73match
jiromoriarty.com
jiro_Moriarty
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
73match
jinxuowemeasoda.com
Jinx's Soda Co.
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
70match
kelzeon.com
Kelzeon
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
kelemvore.com
Kelemvore Apparel
5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
66match
majorpain-og.com
Major Pain-OG
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
65match
kengiecat.com
kengiecat
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
65match
kennywild.com
kenny wild
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
64match
manawhims.com
ManaWhims
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
jjshankles.com
JJ Shankles
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
60match
manumercurial.com
ManuMercurial
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
60match
manhamproductions.com
Man Ham Productions
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
maktkamp.com
maktkamp
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
jjcaba.com
JJ caba
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
kangaroonyx.com
Lord Roonyx Merch
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
57match
jjbates.com
JJ Bates LLC
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
57match
matskovbo.com
MatSkovbo
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
56match
laramieburrill.com
Laramie Burrill
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
56match
makerbugstore.com
MAKERBUG
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.