Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to mamodechic.com

Ranesshop · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
78match
mattjjarii.com
MATTJJARII
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
76match
mirakmart.com
mirak mart
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
67match
marhabashoper.com
marhabashoper
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
65match
jaouadshop.com
jaouad shop
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
65match
1tikstore.com
1tikstor
1 co-citations6 shared tech0 shared categorygrocery-shopping
63match
aljudiy.com
الجودي
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
majliscart.com
MajlisCart
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
1kech.com
1Kech
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
banatalhajj.com
بنات الحاج — السوق
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
elbarakas.com
elbarakas
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
60match
mallfet.com
Mall Fet
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
60match
el-arabe.com
el-arabe
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
59match
bahrainbazaar.com
BahrainBazaar
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
matrix-iq.com
عالم ماتركس
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
57match
jelabti.com
jelabticom
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
57match
janahkhaliji.com
janahkhaliji
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
57match
elhidhab.com
elhidhab
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
56match
eldbah.com
الصفحة الرئيسية - الدباح
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.