Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to malkiwiegner.com

Malki Wiegner - Designing with Intent · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
designingwithdata.co.uk 🇬🇧
Designing with Data – Contents
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
echodzns.com
EchoDesigns - Designed with intent. Built with precision.
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
atelierbym.com
Crafting Timeless Designs with Intention and Emotion
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
btiller.com
Bryan Tiller - Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
fumberger.com
David Fumberger - Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
functionaljunk.com
green designing
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
abbey-skinner.com
Abbey Skinner - Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
labeldesigner.co.uk 🇬🇧
Label Designer - Home Page
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
jueunnam.com
Jueun Nam - Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
jyrenkoh.com
Jyren Koh - Designer & Maker
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
palmcourtstudios.com
PALM COURT STUDIOS – Designing with purpose. Building with art.
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
theashariqbal.com
Brand Designer - Ashar Iqbal
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
admdesigning.com
ADM Designing – Graphic Designer and Author
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
lucasbica.com
Lucas Bica - Designer at Apple
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
redersoft.com
LED Panel Designer - RederSoft
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
aadesigns.tech
Design with JSK
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
atmosferaarchitects.com
atmosfera architects – Designing Spaces with a Soul
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
bryanviper.com
Artist & Designer - Bryan Viper
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.