Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to malcolmcostain.com

Malcolm Costain – Author Website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
88match
pattelford.com
Pattison Telford – Author website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
84match
aaroncolewilliams.com
Aaron Cole Williams - Author Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
78match
demiwildeauthor.com
Author Demi Wilde Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
76match
abigailwadlington.com
Abigail Wadlington's Author Website
2 shared topicsfiction
76match
ilyasevans.com
Kris Ilyas Evans – Author site
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
76match
arenluxon.com
Aren Luxon – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
anitahalvorssen.com
Anita Halvorssen – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
75match
anneboothauthor.com
Anne Booth – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
amytordoff.com
Amy Tordoff – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
apeksharao.com
Apeksha Rao – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
reneebeyea.com
Renée Beyea – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
blakepalafox.com
Blake Palafox – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
angelasweeney.com
Angela Sweeney – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
anthonysegarrabooks.com
Anthony Segarra – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
kimberlysavage.com
KIMBERLY SAVAGE – AUTHOR
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
patricekasimov.com
Patrice Kasimov – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
andrewfukuda.com
Andrew Fukuda – Author Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
aartemischen.com
A. Artemis Chen | Author – Author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.