Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to maktkamp.com

maktkamp · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
73match
jasusi.com
Jasusi
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
70match
kengiecat.com
kengiecat
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
70match
kennywild.com
kenny wild
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
jarileesart.com
Jarilee
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
jheshop.com
James Hates Everything
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
jjcaba.com
JJ caba
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
jjshankles.com
JJ Shankles
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
65match
manhamproductions.com
Man Ham Productions
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
64match
majorpain-og.com
Major Pain-OG
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
maliquedlewis.com
Purpose Driven
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
jlcrafted.com
J.L & Crafted
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
jiromoriarty.com
jiro_Moriarty
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
kelemvore.com
Kelemvore Apparel
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
kelzeon.com
Kelzeon
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
laramieburrill.com
Laramie Burrill
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
mediocreamateur.com
Mediocre Amateur
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
61match
manawhims.com
ManaWhims
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
60match
jankles.com
jeremyjankles
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.