Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to makers-at-work.com

Makers at Work · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
makefieldworks.com
Makefield Works
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
archforge.dev
GritWerk — Apps That Work
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
makerstudio.io
Home | MakerStudio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
go-workflow.com
SHAR Workflow Engine
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
glimrworks.com
Glimr Works
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
maliceworks.com
Malice Works
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
makechieve.com
Makechieve — We Build Software That Works
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
thealgo.dev
TheAlgo — Software That Works
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
checkersvs.com
Checkers VS!
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
kidsappmaker.com
Kids App Maker
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
reminders-api.com
Reminders API
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
tgcworks.com
TGC Works LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
ebsta-webservices.co.uk 🇬🇧
Make your CRM work, ebsta
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
kilroyapps.com
Kilroy Applications | Software That Works
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
1code.net
1Code Work Space
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
mangobuns.com
Mangobuns — Mac Utilities That Just Work
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
anmolapps.com
AR Apps — Apps that just work.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
makeshxt.com
makeshxt
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.