Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to majeong.com

3대째 내려오는 명품기름 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation

jindalledream.com

진달래의꿈

3 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

3 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

수제 生 양갱 전문점 금옥당

1 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorygrocery-shopping

A-SE STUDIO 아쎄스튜디오

3 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

(주)바른공장 공식 홈페이지

3 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

하우컴퍼니

3 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

봄나래 도라지정과♥상견례선물

3 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categorygifts-and-greetings-cards

A2CCASE 에이투씨케이스

2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

aaewoo 아애우

2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

구제스토어

2 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

보은전통장신구

2 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

또 다른 경험의 시작! 브레스밋 공식홈

2 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

진세농원 | 자연을 담은 바른식품

2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorygrocery-shopping

2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

아바프로샵ㅣABA프로샵

2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

케이켐 l KYEKHEM

2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

co-citations how often the same third-party websites link out to both — sites referenced together tend to serve the same world.
shared tech how much of their technology stack (CMS, e‑commerce, analytics, frameworks…) overlaps.
shared category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
positioning how closely their titles and on‑page wording line up.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.