Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to maishajack.com

Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
celtictalesgalway.com
Home
4 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
78match
kennethsmyson.com
Home
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
adrienneraphel.com
Home
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
juliameinwaldwrites.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
julielcasey.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
77match
makilien.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
76match
jejack.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
75match
janaoliver.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
75match
jaredstonefield.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
72match
jenniferjeanwriter.com
Home
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypoetry
72match
jeffhoulahan.com
Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
71match
devilsplaypublishing.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
71match
janellrhiannon.com
Home
4 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
70match
aramgoudsouzian.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
70match
corywilcox.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
69match
cerinawrites.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
69match
adriandebeer.com
Home
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
69match
jaredrlopatin.com
JARED R. LOPATIN - Home
3 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.