Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mahergrf.com

Maher Guerfali - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
ricknaegele.com
rick naegele - software engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
gamesoftwareengineering.com
Game Software Engineering
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
surajkarthikeyan.com
Suraj Karthikeyan — Software Engineer & Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
nyanlh.com
NYAN QUEST — Nyan Lin Htet, Software Engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
superstra.com
My Projects - Game Developer and Software Engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
nyarenari.com
Nyarenari — Games & Software Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
terabit-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
TeraBit Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
terabitsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
TeraBit Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
anrael.com
AnRaEl - software development studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
shoaibriaz.com
Shoaib Riaz | Senior Game Engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
magneticjam.com
Magnetic Jam Software Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
gamesandsoftware.com
Games and Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
gavziagames.com
Gavzia Games | software solutions
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
moonsoftwareroblox.com
Moon Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
odesoftware.com
Ode Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
islegend.com
LegendAF — Content Creator, Software Engineer and Indie Game Dev
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
battleengineering.com
Home | Battle Engineering
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
lucasabreu.com.br 🇧🇷
Lucas Abreu — Game Engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.