similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to magiodev.com

magiodev (magiodev.eth) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

wagisdev (John Spence) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

etianen (Dave Hall) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

kolkhis (Connor W.) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

MattCain (Matt Cain) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

MSusik (Mateusz Susik) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dimensi (Nikita Nafranets) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

DITA Users · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jjesuscastro (Jesus Castro) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

iStorry (Jatinjit Singh) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

sustainfund.com

SustainFund · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

riansaunders.com

riansaunders (Rian) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

nruffing (Nick Ruffing) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

moertel (Stefanie Fehling) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

henrikjanke.com

HenrikJanke (Henrik) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

npc137 (Kody Jordan) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

mikeoertli (Mike Oertli) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

reza-sadr (Reza Sadr) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.