similar sites

‹ profile Tools

Sites similar to magicant.dev

Camron Bartlow · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

gauravnarwani.com

Blog | I'm Gaurav Narwani

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

calebbolton.com

calebbolton.tech

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

dillonfrankesecurity.com

Dillon Franke Security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Isopach's blog – Isopach's CTF writeups and security research

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Shon Gur — Security Researcher

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

oceanwarranty.com

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

conorkotwasinski.com

Conor Kotwasinski

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

OBX — Ahmad Obeidat

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

ethdevwatch.com

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

camerontait.com

Cameron Tait - Blog

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Mac's personal website

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

be4sec – An Information Security Blog

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.