Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to magicaldictionary.com

Magical Dictionary · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
magicanalyzer.com
MagicAnalyzer
1 shared topicscard-games
68match
magicart.io
MagiCart: Smart MTG Collection Tracker
1 shared topicscard-games
68match
magicalpiles.com
Magical Piles — MTG Collection Manager
1 shared topicscard-games
66match
magicdealersstore.com
MagicDealers
1 shared topicscard-games
66match
magicaldeckgatherer.com
magicaldeckgatherer — MTG Deck Builder
1 shared topicscard-games
66match
magicchesthouston.com
MagicChest Houston
1 shared topicscard-games
66match
pokepredict.com
PokéPredict - Pokemon Card Price Predictions
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
beforethegrade.com
Before The Grade | AI-Powered Card Grading Predictions
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
canastamagic.com
CanastaMagic
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
magicmanamate.com
MMM - Magic Mana Mate
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
magichandsolo.com
The Legendary Magic Hand Solo
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
magicin3d.com
Magic in 3D | Premium 3D-Printed TCG Accessories
1 shared topicscard-games
65match
magicsak.com
MagicSAK - The Swiss Army Knife for Magic: The Gathering
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
magicpropselite.com
Incredible Magic
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
magicsimp.com
Magic Simp
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
diogo-duarte.com
Magic: The Gathering Promo Codes and Event Guides - diogo-duarte.com
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
magictations.com
Magictations – Meditations on Magic the Gathering
1 shared topicscard-games
64match
magicscout.com
Magic the Gathering Reference Program for Palm OS - Magic Scout
1 shared topicscard-games

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.