Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maficresources.com

Home - MAFIC LTD · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
pbnetworks.co.uk 🇬🇧
HOME -
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
beinitenergy.com
Home - BEINIT Energy
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
70match
beinitgas.com
Home - BEINIT Energy
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
69match
2-7energy.com
Home - 2-7 energy
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
69match
sysaid-group.com
Home - SysAid
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
68match
conexenergycorp.com
Home - Conex Energy corp
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
67match
hermanweissker.com
Home - Herman Weissker, Inc.
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
65match
genesisendeavors.com
Home
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
65match
cablewhips.com
Home Page - cablewhips.com
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
65match
pmies.com
Homepage - Power Contracting LLC
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
64match
cadeprojects.com
Cade Projects - Home
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
64match
gemmapower.com
Homepage
2 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
64match
connectpipelines.com
Home | BUUK Infrastructure
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
connecthomesecurity.com
Home | BUUK Infrastructure
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
gasinfrastructure.com
Home | BUUK Infrastructure
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
gasinfrastructure.net
Home | BUUK Infrastructure
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
connecthomesecurity.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home | BUUK Infrastructure
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
buukinfrastructure.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home | BUUK Infrastructure
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.