Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maeksilver.com

Writing Local History - Mae K. Silver · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ancientcelticnations.com
Living History - Home
1 shared topicshistory
70match
caldertales.com
CalderTales | Local history blog
1 shared topicshistory
68match
holocaustlearning.org.uk 🇬🇧
Holocaust Centre North · A global history through local stories
1 shared topicshistory
67match
monroepolicega.com
History of MPD - Monroe PD
1 shared topicshistory
67match
superqueerhistory.com
Super Queer History - Super Queer History
1 shared topicshistory
67match
pointpleasanthistory.com
Point Pleasant Area History Site
1 shared topicshistory
67match
ancienthistoryguide.com
Home - Ancient History Guide
1 shared topicshistory
67match
gatheringthevoices.com
Holocaust Oral History Scotland | Gathering the Voices
1 shared topicshistory
66match
bayareahistory.com
Bay Area History
1 shared topicshistory
66match
banking-history.org.uk 🇬🇧
British Banking History Society
1 shared topicshistory
66match
resoundinghistories.com
Resounding Histories
1 shared topicshistory
66match
6thagepod.com
The 6th Age Podcast | Discover Medieval History Today
1 shared topicshistory
66match
helenglew.com
Helen Glew – Historical Research and Writing
1 shared topicshistory
66match
kophistory.com
KOP History - Knights of Pythias
1 shared topicshistory
66match
ancientconspiracies.com
Home | Ancient Conspiracies | Biblical History
1 shared topicshistory
66match
gaspee.com
Gaspee Days | History & Events
1 shared topicshistory
66match
herebehistory.com
Here Be History
1 shared topicshistory
66match
magicalquiz.com
Brief History Quiz
1 shared topicshistory

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.