Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to madwizard.com

Martin The Mad Wizard · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
sharonedgemartin.com
Sharon Edge Martin
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
heldintheordinary.com
Held in the Ordinary
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
angerintheclassroom.com
Anger in the Classroom
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
gareydemartini.com
gareydemartini
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
callmerick.com
Call Me Rick • Grace in the Middle
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
obamaspringsteenbook.com
Renegades: Born in the USA
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
revechoapp.com
Revecho - Join the Waitlist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
itlpress.com
itlpress | in the light press
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
moomoose.com
moomoose the moose
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
herplaceintheory.com
Her Place in Theory
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
maccabeereview.com
The Maccabee Review
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
susanthelibrarian.com
Susan the Librarian
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
callofethiopia.com
The Call in the Land of Ethiopia
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
revuedigest.com
Revue | The magazine that’s made for you.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
madwatermedia.com
Home - Mad Water Media
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
shanemikus.com
Lantern in the Dark Publications -
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
bead-wire.com
Bead Wire -
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
estatemade.com
Estate Made
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.