Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to madweeks.com

Mad Weeks — World Cup 2026 Edition · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
8kicks.com
8kicks — World Cup 2026 Predictions
1 shared topicssoccer
77match
bastermania.com
Bastermania | World Cup 2026 Predictions
1 shared topicssoccer
75match
ocharters.com
World Cup Hub — World Cup 2026 Hub
1 shared topicssoccer
75match
revarnetta.com
World Cup Hub — World Cup 2026 Hub
1 shared topicssoccer
74match
shipsglo.com
Home — Shipsglo World Cup 2026
1 shared topicssoccer
74match
beardmankit.com
Football Insights — World Cup 2026 Insights
1 shared topicssoccer
74match
kojak.app
Kojak — Predict the FIFA World Cup 2026 with friends
1 shared topicssoccer
72match
shawahcpa.com
Football Insights — World Cup Insights 2026
1 shared topicssoccer
72match
plsurvivor.com
Futbol Fantasy — Premier League survivor pools + World Cup 2026 brackets
1 shared topicssoccer
71match
nycfanbase.com
FanBase NYC — World Cup 2026 Watch Parties in NYC
1 shared topicssoccer
71match
rhiwbinafc.com
Rhiwbina FC · World Cup 2026 Prediction Fundraiser
1 shared topicssoccer
71match
0xscore.com
0xScore · World Cup '26
1 shared topicssoccer
71match
caceressarubbi.com
Goal Moments — The 2026 World Cup Starts Here
1 shared topicssoccer
71match
playgoalory.com
Goalory | World Cup 2026 Bracket Challenge & FIFA 2026 Prediction Game
1 shared topicssoccer
70match
koydam.com
HAMA · World Cup 2026 Predictor
1 shared topicssoccer
70match
monroescarves.com
Fan Strategy — World Cup Insights Daily
1 shared topicssoccer
70match
svato.com
World Cup 2026 Family Picks
1 shared topicssoccer
70match
etzah.ai
World Cup 2026 Predictions | Powered by AIHippos
1 shared topicssoccer

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.