Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to madul.dev

Mädūl says Hi! 😊 | Mädūl · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
garethhubball.com
About Me · Gareth's Musings
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
heinjs.com
hein
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
m7mdbook.com
M7mdBook - Programming & Code Documentation
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
itazura.io
いたずら
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
chinbacode.be 🇧🇪
NextPortfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
moltenc.com
Evolved C programming language | Molten C
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
rexercises.com
R Exercises | Programming Exercises for Finance in the R Language
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
calphorus.com
CalPhorus
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
esptool-react.com
esptool-react - ESP Device Programming in the Browser
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
composeconference.com
C◦mp◦se :: Conference
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
calva.io
Clojure Interactive Programming for Visual Studio Code - Calva User Guide
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
helpmecode.dev
HelpMeCode
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
callumscode.com
Dynamic types in Haskell - Callum's Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
madhatprogrammers.com
Mad Hat Programmers : About
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ananke.dev
The Ananke Programming Language
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dinhle.com
Dinh
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dinhvle.com
Dinh
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dipolito.dev
Homepage | Dipolito
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.