Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to madfoundation.com

MAD Foundation · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
1hfoundation.com
1H FOUNDATION
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
79match
gbfoundations.com
GB Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
79match
plutusinvestment.com
Emma Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
bcrfoundation.com
BCR Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
bdcfoundation.com
BDC Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
dlofoundation.com
DLO Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
gandtfoundation.com
G&T Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
krapafoundation.com
Krapa foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
nwjfoundation.com
NWJ Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
ribafoundation.com
RIBA FOUNDATION
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
revafoundation.com
Reva Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
anehfoundation.com
ANEH Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
helpforuganda.com
BUDAIR FOUNDATION
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
superintelligentgood.com
Colabi Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
anvifoundation.com
Anvi Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
78match
helpfoundation.com
Help Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
77match
kokofoundation.com
KOKO Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
77match
nyksfoundation.com
NYKS Foundation
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.