Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to madcat.com

MadCat Software, LLC · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
essa-software.com
ESSA Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
jackalopeventures.com
Jackalope Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
confluencesoftware.com
Confluence Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
macrocatsoftware.com
MacroCat Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
surpassingsoftware.com
Surpassing Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
gtsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
GT Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
etsoftwares.com
ET Softwares
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
shtsoftware.com
SHT Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
bttsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
BTT Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
aptsoftware.co.nz 🇳🇿
Apt Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
2bitsoftware.com
2bit Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
justsoftware.com.br 🇧🇷
Just Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
dotsoftwares.in 🇮🇳
DOt Softwares
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
esnetsoftware.com
Esnet Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
gecsoftware.com
GEC Software, Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
idiotsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Idiot Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
behestsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Behest Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
behestsoftware.uk 🇬🇧
Behest Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.