Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mactaba.com

Bookapy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
koabooks.com
Koa Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
gardners.com
Gardners - Gardners Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
gatchobooks.com
HOME | GatchoBooks
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
kneewallbooks.com
Knee Wall Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
isbn-us.com
ISBN Book Database
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
kontenabuku.com
Book Store | Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
poettibooks.com
Poetti Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
antennabooks.com
Antenna Books - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
oasisaudio.com
Oasis Audio - Audiobook Publishers of Family-Friendly Audiobooks
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
reviewmybook.com
Get Your Book Reviewed | Kirkus Indie Reviews
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
newbook.com.br 🇧🇷
Home - Newbook
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
geekygeckobooks.com
Home - Geeky Gecko Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
bearbootbooks.com
Bear Boot Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
digitobooks.com
Digito Books | The EBooks Marketplace
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
calliseditora.com
Callis | children's book publisher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
retailbookarbitrage.com
Book Arbitrage | Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
bayladex.com
Bayla Publishing | books and articles by William R. Vitanyi
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
etheridgepress.com
Etheridge Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.