Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to macrosites.com

Growing Communities - macrosites · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
madfamilies.com
madcommunities
1 shared topicssocial-networking
72match
madteams.com
madcommunities
1 shared topicssocial-networking
72match
ethcommunities.com
Ethereum Communities
1 shared topicssocial-networking
71match
dixiessbt.com
SSBT Community
1 shared topicssocial-networking
71match
mortgagelendinghub.com
Communities - LendingHUB
1 shared topicssocial-networking
70match
communityhubz.com
CommHubz | Discover and Build Communities
1 shared topicssocial-networking
70match
communitycurve.com
Community Curve
1 shared topicssocial-networking
70match
connectcommunities.com
Connect Communities by OneTrust
1 shared topicssocial-networking
70match
esgconnect.com
Connect Communities by OneTrust
1 shared topicssocial-networking
69match
oddsrabbit.com
OddsRabbit - Communities for everything you love.
1 shared topicssocial-networking
69match
island0.com
Island: A human-only community
1 shared topicssocial-networking
69match
revyhub.com
Community Feed
1 shared topicssocial-networking
69match
escalonweather.com
Chris Lindmark | Web3 Community Builder
1 shared topicssocial-networking
69match
antivaxadate.com
Anti-Vax Dating and Social Community
1 shared topicssocial-networking
69match
communitycopilot.com
Community Copilot
1 shared topicssocial-networking
68match
communityemotes.com
Community Emotes
1 shared topicssocial-networking
68match
planetdaycare.com
MemberPad — Where Creator Communities Thrive
1 shared topicssocial-networking
68match
resihub.app
ResiHub – Connecting Residents, Empowering Communities
1 shared topicssocial-networking

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.