Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to macroroutine.com

Marlowe Keynes Research | Weekly Macro Chartbook · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
macroedgeresearch.com
Macro Edge Research
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
bazaartrek.com
Geometric Market Research
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
garciaecheverri.com
Economic Research | Eduardo Garcia Echeverri
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
eslemimamoglu.com
Eslem Imamoglu - Economics Researcher
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
diwalabs.com
DIWA Research Labs
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
platformeconomies.net
Platform Economies Research Network
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
shawnnews.com
Global Macro Desk — Shawn News
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
nurmd.com
Nur Mohammad | Researcher
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
macro-pea.com
Home | Macro Pea
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
macroinformation.com
Macro Dashboard - Real-time US Economic Indicators
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
connor-cole.com
Overview and Research - Connor Cole U.S. Treasury Deparment
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
macroanalytix.com
Macro Analytix | MacroAnalytix | Substack
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
anishpoudel.com
Anish Poudel - Economics Student & Research Assistant
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
swanstant.com
Swanstant — Climate-econometric research firm | Calibrated forecasts of climate's economic impact
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
iskakovs.com
Serik Iskakov | Economist and Independent Researcher
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
macrofireside.com
The Macro Fireside | Substack
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
macroutc.com
Global Economics, Finance & Political Analysis | MacroUTC
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
divitiae.ai
DIVITIAE.AI: Macroeconomics & Markets
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.