Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to macrelix.com

MacRelix · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
60match
1hko.com
1hko.com – 1hko
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
1workx.com
1workx.co
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
anvilos.com
AnvilOS – AnvilOS – A standards-conforming embedded platform
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
beagle-os.com
Beagle OS | Standalone Virtualization and Thin Clients
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
bearsontheloose.com
TimeTraveler™
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
beatos.app
BeatOS — Life OS
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
cactusprotocol.com
CactusOS - by Cactus Protocol
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
caeros.ai
Cæros — Early Access
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
caeros.com
Cæros — Early Access
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
camicom.com
Home
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
camflow.org
CamFlow: practical whole-system provenance for Linux
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
camfolio.dev
CamB.OS
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
commandprograms.com
CommandPrograms
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
commandreopen.com
Command Reopen — Fix Cmd+Tab & Alt+Tab for Minimized Windows on Mac
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
computer3.com
COMPUT3R // the third computer
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
dinofly.com
DinoFly :: The Home of Twinsen, Linux, and Windows Files and Downloads
2 shared topicsoperating-systems
60match
diskmakerx.com
DiskMaker X
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
djobar.com
Djobar - The Windows 11 toolbar replacement
2 shared topicsoperating-systems

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.