Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to macoun.dev

portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
cameron-salazar.dev
Cameron Salazar - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
caleecs.com
My Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
heldm.com
My Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
kumarashish.com
Ashish Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
anasalakkad.com
Anas Alakkad | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
ethanreese.com
Ethan Reese - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
andriyoga.com
Andri Yoga | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
krisjulio.dev
Kris - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
hemab.dev
Hema's Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
bearhagen.com
Bjørnar Hagen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
connorsteele.com
Connor Steele | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
garethdean.dev
Gareth Dean Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
geewey.com
Gee-Wey Yue | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
plumega.com
GP's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
connor-madigan.com
Connor Madigan | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
moonhellal.com
Moonhellal — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
andresevaldez.com
Andres Valdez Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
rhamzthev.com
Rhamsez Thevenin - Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.