Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to macospet.com

App List | Mac App · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
macosbug.com
App List | Mac App
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
macapplist.com
Mac App List
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
macwidget.com
Mac Widget | Mac App Storefront
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
cemac.app
CEMAC APP
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
errandlist.com
Errand List | Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mac-application.com
Mac Application
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mactreasure.com
Mac Treasure | Curated List of macOS Apps
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
avocet.app
Avocet - Delightful Mac Apps
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
macappslibrary.com
Mac Apps Directory
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
getbodo.com
Bodo - Beautiful Mac app for Jira®
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
macromodeling.com
about | macromodeling
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
macweb.app
Home | MacWeb
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
keebooapp.com
Keeboo App LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
runondevice.com
Translate On-Device — Mac App
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
opbeats.com
Opbeats — App Library
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
macosui.dev
macos_ui | macos_ui
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
awesome-mac-apps.com
Awesome Mac Apps – Awesome Mac Apps
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
glasscode.app
GlassCode | The Best Mac App for Claude Code
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.