Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to macmladen.com

MacMladen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
anarute.com
root#ana | Ana Rute
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
call-me-ty.com
Ty's Digital Garden
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
caden32.com
caden32
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
mohcinbounouara.com
Mohcin Bounouara - Thoughts about software engineering and life
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
itskishan.com
Kishan Patel
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
jacoelho.com
Posts
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
calvinpun.com
Calvin Pun
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
aamirj.com
Aamir J. Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
jagreenwood.com
index | ~$ jagreenwood
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
anthonyhub.com
AnthonyHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
hexar-decimal.com
Hexar-Decimal – Programming, Technology, and Life
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
jacoyutorius.com
too young to die, too drink to live
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
japaric.io
Embedded in Rust
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
objectionable-c.com
Objectionable-C | Objectionable-C
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
jaimeblasco.com
Jaime Blasco
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
gaoledai.com
About me - Gaole Dai
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
itsmehatef.com
Hatef Kasraei
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gerbenvanadrichem.com
Gerben's blog | Musings on software development and quality assurance
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.