Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mackerwin.com

MacKenzie Kerwin · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
mackenziehatcher.com
Mackenzie Hatcher
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
mackboudreau.com
Mackenzie Boudreau — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
caleblee.dev
Backend Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
monirzam.dev
Monir Zaman - Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
andreamatt.dev
Andrea Matté — Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
anupamhaldkar.com
Anupam Haldkar | Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
mackolicious.com
Mackolicious
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
monubi.dev
Monubi Justin — Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
dilanderegozu.com
Dilan Deregozu — Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
antonchesnokov.com
Anton Chesnokov | CTO / Backend Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mohsinkhandevs.com
Mohsin Khan | Systems & Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
madhusgowda.com
Madhu S Gowda | Senior Web3 Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
dladeira.com
Daniel Ladeira - Backend/DevOps Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
mabdelfadeil.com
Mahmoud Abdelfadeil | Senior Backend Architect
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
andreyandrade.com
Andrey Andrade - Backend Engineer | Go Specialist
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
anuragthepathak.com
Anurag Pathak — Backend Systems & Architecture
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
kousaila.dev
Kousaila - Backend Developer | DevOps Researcher
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
odnix.com
odnix - on software
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.