Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to machuta.com

A Researcher's Field Notes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
brain-researcher.com
Brain Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
famousamous.com
Amous (Ziyu) Qiu — Research Notes
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
argosresearch.com
Argos Research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
rp-works.com
Rii - UX Researcher Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
aipersonaresearch.org
AI Persona Research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
aeonresearch.ai
aeon research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
roxanaakhmetova.com
Roxana Akhmetova | Policy Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
pinetree-research.com
Pinetree Research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
akul.ai
Akul Datta - Engineer & Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
rubytheresearcher.com
Ruby the Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
societyofresearchers.com
Society of Researchers
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
mdsunbeam.com
Sunbeam | Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
akslaym.dev
Akshay Mehta | Systems Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
neurosilk.dev
NeuroSilk Research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
anmolai.info
Anmol | AI Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
bhurtha.org
Dr. Research Hub
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
neuronxresearch.com
NeuronX Research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
rockartstation.com
Dr. Research Hub
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.