Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to macgator.com

材料研究学会(MRS)|材料科学期刊、会议、推广 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
daylightacademy.ch 🇨🇭
Daylight Academy - A VELUX STIFTUNG initiative
1 shared topicsscience
64match
helparesearcher.com
Help A Researcher
1 shared topicsscience
63match
isnbs.com
ISNBS
1 shared topicsscience
63match
animate-science.com
Science Animations | Animate Your Science
1 shared topicsscience
63match
israelscientometrics.com
The Israeli Scientometrics Academic Community
1 shared topicsscience
63match
shapingmatterlab.com
SHAPING MATTER LAB @ TU DELFT - Home
1 shared topicsscience
63match
estg-fayoum.com
ESTG - Fayoum University
1 shared topicsscience
63match
ispsmind.com
Internationalassociationphilosophyofsciencesofmind
1 shared topicsscience
63match
eurekalert.com
EurekAlert! Science News Releases
1 shared topicsscience
63match
3mbed.com
3MBED – Science Communication & Design for Biotech and Research
1 shared topicsscience
63match
iwam-rakcam.com
IWAM - Attend
1 shared topicsscience
63match
monzilur.com
Monzilur Rahman
1 shared topicsscience
63match
monzilurrahman.com
Monzilur Rahman
1 shared topicsscience
63match
bbmanthan.com
Manthan: Peer-Reviewed International Journal for Scientific Innovation & Research from Bihar
1 shared topicsscience
63match
sutrerabarrios.com
Saul Utrera-Barrios - Polymer Scientist
1 shared topicsscience
63match
ismsic.com
2026 International Conference on Information Science, Modeling and Simulation (ISMS 2026)
1 shared topicsscience
63match
sis-group.org.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome - Society for Interdisciplinary Studies
1 shared topicsscience
63match
ankurpaliwal.com
Ankur Paliwal | Science Journalist | New Delhi
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.