Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ma2holding.com

MA2 Holding · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
sharmr.com
DMC Holding
1 shared topicsventure-capital
72match
calayoholdings.com
Calayo Holdings
1 shared topicsventure-capital
72match
oberon.ai
Oberon Holdings
1 shared topicsventure-capital
72match
anicetoholdings.com
Aniceto Holdings
1 shared topicsventure-capital
71match
2eholdings.com
HOME | 2E Holdings
1 shared topicsventure-capital
70match
kodimariholdings.com
Kodimari Holdings Ltd
1 shared topicsventure-capital
69match
oceanview-holding.com
Ocean View Holding Ltd.
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
revonenergy.com
VENNOVA INVESTMENT HOLDINGS
1 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
hevarto.com
Hevarto — A Holding Company
1 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
3gup.com
3gup.com Creative Venture Holdings
1 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
ethanheim.com
Ethanheim Holdings | Venture Group
1 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
issorite.com
Issorite — Internet Holding Company
1 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
knmholding.com
KNM Holdings | Private Holding Company
1 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
resiris.com
Resiris Holdings | Growth, Regenerated.
1 shared topicsventure-capital
65match
helioscrest.com
Helios Crest - Innovation Holding Company
1 shared topicsventure-capital
65match
caddieventures.com
Caddie Ventures | Holding Company & Portfolio
1 shared topicsventure-capital
65match
ancientassets.org
Ancient Assets | Holdings, Ventures, Philanthropy
1 shared topicsventure-capital
63match
essentia-holdings.com
Essentia Holdings - The Future of Digital Infrastructure Starts Here
1 shared topicsventure-capital

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.