Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ma-group.com

About us - MA Group AG · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
hemming-group.com
Hemming Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
hgluk.com
Hemming Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
mpigroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome to The MPI Group - Marine Publishing, Training & Marketing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
heinleingroup.com
HEINLEIN GROUP
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
diversifiedbooksgroup.com
Diversified Books Group | Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
shefaliabhi.com
Asian Media Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
shefalisolanki.com
Asian Media Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
odrazmedia.com
Odraz Media Group | Global B2B Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
hfgroup.com
HF Group, LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
obsidianpublishers.com
Obsidian Media Group | Stories. Media. Intellectual Property.
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
battleroyalebooks.com
Hachette Book Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
moontravelbooks.com
Hachette Book Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
nycmedianetwork.com
About - NYC News Network
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
plainenglishmedia.com
About - Plain-English Media
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
modassicgroup.com
The MODassic Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
mondadori.com
Home | Mondadori Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
mondadorigroup.com
Home | Mondadori Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
shanlaxpublications.com
Shanlax Publications - Madurai
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.