Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to m-rutter.com

Some Michael Rutter · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
andreih.com
programming, career and life
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
supersoftcafe.com
Super Soft Cafe – Michael Brown. A cafe and coding addict.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
calvin-bonomo.com
Calvin Bonomo
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
isaiaholoyede.com
Home | Isaiah Oloyede
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
beausimensen.com
Beau Simensen
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
compilade.com
Compilade
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
beancaserdena.com
Beanca Camille Serdena
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
moduletux.com
Moduletux
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
moduletux.dev
Moduletux
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewls.com
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
computer-speaker.com
Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bayubit.com
bayubit | software engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
calphorus.com
CalPhorus
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
knowfatties.com
Not A Number - Programming, Theory, and Math
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nymspace.com
Not A Number - Programming, Theory, and Math
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
shanrauf.com
Shan Rauf
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
shittydocs.com
Shitty Docs - Learn Some Shit
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lighthosting.co.uk 🇬🇧
SquidDev | SquidDev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.