similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to lynfarrell.com

LYN FARRELL - Lia Farrell, author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

annefarrellauthor.com

Anne Farrell Author | Children's author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Lyn Gala, author

2 shared topicsfiction

shelleyburbank.com

Shelley Burbank | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

annemortensenwriter.com

Anne Mortensen, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Lyn Yeowart, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bethbussiere.com

Beth Bussiere, Author

2 shared topicsfiction

dinahavranek.com

Dina Havranek, Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Thriller Author Guy Mace

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Henry Kisor Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

monique-roy.com

Monique Roy, author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

pknortonauthor.com

P K Norton – The Amy Lynch Investigations

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Lynn M. Dixon, Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Montie Red Cozy Mystery Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Home | R. M. Shepherd, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andieyoungwrites.com

Andie Young, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

angiepaxton.com

Angie Paxton | author

2 shared topicsfiction

annetteteepe.com

Annette Teepe, Author - Life is a Wonderful Story!

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

MOLLY PINE, AUTHOR

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.