Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to lwebb.dev

Logan Webb | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
evanking.dev
Evan King | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
andrewtgionfriddo.com
Andrew Gionfriddo - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
aaronjasperson.com
Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
calculated-code.com
calculatedCode | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ricardofearing.com
Ricardo Fearing - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
antipotion.com
Antipotion | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
shaunasaunders.com
Shauna Saunders - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
connortabora.com
Connor Tabora | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
richardcodes.com
Richard Rodriguez | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andreidi.com
Andrei Diaconu - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andydiaz.dev
Andy Díaz Valdiviezo | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
obarsal.dev
Rubar Ozan Barsal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
kofimupati.com
Kofi Mupati | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
konin.dev
Max Konin | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
anjukaranji.com
Anju Karanji - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ivinay.dev
Vinay Naik | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.