Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to luqmanazeem.com

Luqman Azeem – Game Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
owenbassdesign.com
Owen Bass – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
calebwharton.com
Caleb Wharton – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
simonhalliday.com
Simon Halliday – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
eerrard.com
Emmanuel Errard – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
andrewstewartgames.com
Andrew Stewart – Game Designer –
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
sihuiliu.com
SIHUI LIU – GAME DESIGNER PORTFOLIO
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
elabnow.com
Elab game design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
judhalpin.com
Jud Halpin / Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
ludocog.com
LudoC⛭g – Game Design and Culture
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
julianstables.com
Julian Stables Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
tevansgames.com
TOM EVANS – GAME DESIGNER & GAMEPLAY SCRIPTER
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
thalesrebelo.com
Thales Rebelo - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
lucacostanzo.com
Luca Costanzo – UI/UX & Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
bwgamedesign.com
Bryce Williams | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
terrasnover.com
Terra Snover — Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
ozoneinteractive.com
Ozone Interactive – Games Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
eganomicon.com
Eganomicon – Video Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.