similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to luminanze.com

Luminanze alternatives & similar sites

Luminanze Consulting — User Experience, User-Centered Interaction Design, Usability, Human Factors — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jonbrownm.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Jonathan Brown — Design, User Experience & Development	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
santoroluca.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Luca Santoro \| UX Designer & User Researcher \| Expert in Human-Centered Design, Prototyping & Accessibility	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adampawliczek.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Usability expert, UX designer, Interaction specialist - Adam Pawliczek	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awong.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Andrew Wong - User Experience Design for Cloud Apps	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
syfu.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Jeffrey Syfu \| User Experience Designer	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samanthauxdesign.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Samaneh Elahi – UI/UX Designer Portfolio (Toronto) User experience designer user interface designer \| Samaneh Elahi	en	web-design-and-html	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debbylevinson.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Deborah A. Levinson \| User Experience Design and Strategy in Boston, MA	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joshuaubatindugan.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Joshua Uba Tindugan · Interaction Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avinash718.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	User Experience Designer \| CUA & CXA \| Building Intuitive Digital Products	en	web-design-and-html Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abrahampmathew.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Abraham - Innovative UX/UI Designer \| User-Centered Design Portfolio	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josedanielortiz.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	José Daniel Ortiz \| Product Designer — User Experience & Interface	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
natalia-peshkova.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Natalia Peshkova — User experience design with focus on content-heavy systems	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolinealtrichter.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Caroline Altrichter \| UX/UI Designer & Usability Engineer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
userexperienced.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	User Experienced	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usergoals.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Home - User Experience Design - Roy Zornow: UX / UI	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desionsync.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Desion Sync \| Expert UI UX Design & Digital Experience Studio for Startups	en	web-design-and-html Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drandalldesign.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Dylan Randall Design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jnweston.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	User Experience, Data Visualization, and Design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.