Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lumatho.com

Home Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
ecomwin.com
eComWin Home Page
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
multitecsolutions.com
Home Page - Multi Tec
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
multitecsolution.com
Home Page - Multi Tec
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
cramilsoft.com
Home Page - CraMilSoft
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
burlyhouse.com
Burly House | Home Page
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
jsofttechnology.com
Home -
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
e-legalsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cullis Software Home Page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
hendosystems.co.uk 🇬🇧
Hendo Systems - Home Page
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
resultsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Result Software Home Page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
2nci.com
Home Page - https://2nci.com
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
cinnamonsystems.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cinnamon Systems - Home Page
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
buildanddeliver.com
Home Page - Build and Deliver
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
efficientworks.co.uk 🇬🇧
EfficientWorks UK - Home page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
businesssoftwareinnovations.com
Home Page - My ASP.NET Application
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
commandersoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home Page | Commander Software Ltd
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
eg-softwaresolutions.com
Home - ESS
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
hksay.com
Home | SAY
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
abspro.net
Home
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.