Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lukeschafer.com

Luke Schafer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
lukehaws.com
Luke Haws
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
lukereichold.com
Luke Reichold
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
lukeaskew.com
Luke Askew
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
lukejgorman.com
Luke Gorman
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
lukekoko.com
Luke Kokoftopoulos
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
adinschmidt.com
Adin Schmidt — Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
lukepaun.com
Luke Paun
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
lukesmurray.com
Luke S. Murray
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
kaiserapps.com
Kaiserapps — Benjamin Kaiser
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
lukeneville.com
Luke Neville
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
justinsch.com
Justin Schreiber's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
lukelengl.com
Home | Luke Lengl
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
moustafaelsawy.com
Moustafa El-Sawy | SE, PE
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
actisdana.com
Alberto Actis Dana — Software that Matters
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
adamsadek.com
adam sadek — software engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
adamdabrowski.dev
Adam Dąbrowski - Software Consultant
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
lukegibson.dev
Luke Gibson
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
lukephillippi.com
luke.ph / Software engineer, etc.
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.