Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lukeheide.com

Luke Heide | Project Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
justdentondevelops.com
JD Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
3bbas.dev
Ahmed Abbas - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
juancwu.dev
Juan Wu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
reneantoun.com
Rene | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
sinavahidi.dev
Sina | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
hitaesh.com
Hitaesh's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
jstnyoo.com
Justin Yoo Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
lookatmycode.com
Look At My Code | Programming Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
juana-portfolio.com
Tech Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
loosiongyu.com
SIONG YU | PORTFOLIO
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
lorrainesanares.com
Lorraine Sanares - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
reeniscode.dev
Reenis Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
aaryaman.me
Aaryaman | Portfolio OS
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
redwanrc.com
Redwan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
simoncha.com
Simon Cha Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
rebeccaansems.com
Rebecca Ansems | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
efrane.com
eFrane.com: Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
junwei-li.com
Junwei Li - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.