Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lukaspradel.com

Lukas Pradel · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
lukasbals.com
Lukas Bals
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
lstoiber.com
Lukas Stoiber
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
lukasheilmann.com
Lukas Heilmann
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
lukasgeiter.com
Lukas Geiter
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
jubari.com
Bastian Halbach | jubari.com
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
abuzer.tech
Abuzer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
alyin.org
Al Yin
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
alwingeorge.dev
Alwin George | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
abigeorge.com
Abi Geroge
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
acatl.dev
Acatl Pacheco — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
jughosta.com
Julia Rechkunova (@jughosta)
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
julianofirme.com
Juliano Firme
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
munaz.dev
Munaz Rahman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
owenhayes.dev
Owen Hayes
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
reggiemenson.com
Reggie Tachie-Menson
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
bukaha.com
Bukaha OÜ | Software engineering
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
juanmaruizf.com
Juan Manuel Ruiz
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.