Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lucy-baker.com

Journalist of the Year Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
acredick.com
Home | Journalist Portfolio
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
ebonyreed.com
Journalist | Ebony Reed
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
alexplucas.net
Alex Lucas – Portfolio
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
pamelaengel.com
Pamela Engel | journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
aej.org
Association of European Journalists
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
eddiemccoven.com
Eddie McCoven – Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
ashleygrahamtv.com
Ashley K. Graham – Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
businessjournalism.org
Business Journalism | The Reynolds Center
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
juliabarajas.com
Julia Barajas – Journalist · Periodista
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
luciaweiss.com
Lucia Weiss – journalist, writer
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
juliannazarionews.com
Julian Nazario – Student Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
louiselazell.com
Louise Lazell – Trainee Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
sindujarangarajan.com
Sinduja Rangarajan - Data Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
65match
annahuntsman.com
ANNA HUNTSMAN – Multimedia Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
65match
pagerresearch.com
PAGER – Independent Journalism
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
65match
ashley-kirk.com
Ashley Kirk – Data and visual journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
65match
jurnalisterate.com
Jurnalis Terate
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
65match
lucykomisar.com
The Komisar Scoop : Reports & Analysis by Investigative Journalist Lucy Komisar
3 shared topicsmedia-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.