Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to luciadohrmann.com

Lucia Dohrmann – South Australian Visual Artist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
anna-handick.com
Anna Handick – visual artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
69match
lorenzognata.com
Lorenzo Gnata – Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
69match
burnsiebburns.com
Calvin B-Burns – Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
69match
rebeccamoorestudios.com
Rebecca Moore Studios – Australian Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
judithsinnamon.com
Judith Sinnamon | Australian Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
lucasvaneeden.com
Lucas van Eeden visual artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
panagiotisvorrias.com
Panagiotis Vorrias – Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
annemartinwalsh.com
annemartinwalsh.com – visual artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
terracottastrategies.com
Bill Peters, Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
silpaart.com
Silpa Art – Visual artists production
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
judithheinsohn.com
Judith Heinsohn – International Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
paivilaakso.com
Päivi Laakso – Visual Artist and Author
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
rediethaddis.com
Rediet Haddis - Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
68match
louiseritchie.com
Louise Ritchie > Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
67match
angelicaescoto.org
Angelica escoto | Visual Artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
67match
julietpog-osia.com
Juliet Pog-osia – London-based visual artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
67match
louisemanifoldstudio.com
LOUISE MANIFOLD - Irish visual artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
67match
justinavilcinskaite.com
Justina Vilčinskaitė | visual artist
2 shared topicsfine-art

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.