Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lucaspetrini.com

lfpetrini (Lucas Petrini) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
lucashecht.com
lucashecht (Lucas Hecht) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
adag.io
rpetrich (Ryan Petrich) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mrpasquini.dev
mrpasquini (Matt Pasquini) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
luca-piras.com
lucapiras5 (Luca Piras) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
owdevel.com
owdevel (Owen Mak) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
brunomikoski.com
brunomikoski (Bruno Mikoski) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
redite.dev
Redite · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
jsopx.com
JasonSilvestri (Jason Silvestri) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
aterra.dev
AterraEngine · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
jsiegel.dev
Lioness100 · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
abraham.dev
abraham (Abraham Williams) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
hnasri.com
HoussemNasri (Houssem Nasri) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
jsilvaiot.com
vankxr (João Silva) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
lonlydwolf.com
lonlydwolf (Ahmad Mollaei) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
simonczech.com
sczech (Simon Czech) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bykowski.dev
bykowskiolaf (Olaf Bykowski) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
jroschmidt.com
jros92 (Jörg Schmidt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.