Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lucaspaocoding.com

Lucas Pao's Coding Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
alexgrimm.dev
Personal Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
gabel.ai
Rob Gabel | Vibe Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
hoganmok.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
abnermolina.com
Abner's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
andrewkluttz.com
Andrew's Coding Lab
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
renepauls.com
René Pauls Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
albertxlynch.com
Albert Lynch Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
loujvaughn.com
Lou Vaughn's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
alex-abraham.dev
Alex Abraham | Software Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
2daysnews.net
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
builtbyseb.com
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
padar.dev
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
burkholder.io
Dean Burkholder - Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
acodingduck.com
A coding duck
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
fudgemillionaire.com
Gabriel Catalfo - Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
gabecatalfo.com
Gabriel Catalfo - Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
ebenezerkouakou.com
Ebenezer Kouakou | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
alfredscyriac.com
Alfred Siby Cyriac's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.