similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to lucascarl.com

lucas-carl (Lucas Carl) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

lucascampelo.com

lucascampelo (Lucas Campelo) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

LucasXu0 (Lucas) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

lucaspar (Lucas Parzianello) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

l-matos (Lucas Matos) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

timaxlucas (Tim Maximilian Lucas) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

alecvdp (Alec) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

luke-skynet (Lucas Yuan) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aaix (aidan) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

nbdy (nbdy) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jcbbb · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

mrijanrimal.com

mrimal · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

hiphof · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jsleex · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Munger · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

reedo (Reedo) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

reedo (Reedo) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.