Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lucadeleo.dev

Luca De Leo · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
lucadeleo.com
Luca De Leo
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
100match
lucadl.com
Luca De Leo
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
lucazosso.com
Luca Zosso
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
adityap.info
Aditya
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
6missedcalls.com
6missedcalls
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
lucasrabay.dev
Lucas Rabay Butcher — AI Engineer & Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
lucasalvo.com
Luca Salvo
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
lucasilverentand.com
Luca Silverentand
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
econtechie.com
Damilola Payne — Writing about technology, economics, and society
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
aniketh.net
Aniketh Bandlamudi
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
longtreelabs.com
LongTree Labs | AI-Native Research & Product Studio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
lucamalagutti.com
Luca Malagutti
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
buildandbe.dev
Build & Be
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
brysontang.com
Bryson Tang | The Digital Matroid
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
muhammedsenusi.com
Muhammed Hassan — Product Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
abstractedmind.com
Indy Khare — Builder of Things
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
juliagoncalves.com
Julia Goncalves — Product Designer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
tharunpoduru.com
Tharun Poduru — Product Builder & AI Strategist
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.