Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to lucacodarini.com

Luca Codarini — Design Director at AKQA, Copenhagen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
julienmillies.com
Julien Milliès — Senior Design Director
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
adriancabrero.com
Adrián Cabrero | Creative Director & Design Director
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
juliadann.com
Julia Dann — Designer & Art Director
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
6ton.com
Design Director
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
lonnietapia.com
💼 Lonnie — Design Director. Culture Maker.
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
loris-cormoreche.com
Loris Cormoreche — Design & Art Direction
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
adiconstantin.com
Adi Constantin - Design & Art Director
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
brunoponzini.com
Bruno Ponzini — Design Drive Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
julianohnacker.com
Julian Ohnacker — Director of Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
courtberg.com
Courtney Berg | Design Director
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
carlosprieto.me
Carlos Prieto | Design Director in NYC
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
aceve.do
Horacio Acevedo | Art Director & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
carldurocher.com
Carl Durocher | Design Director | UX/UI Product Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
adrienneford.com
Adrienne Ford — Design Director & ACD
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
adriennemford.com
Adrienne Ford — Design Director & ACD
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
eddelacruz.com
Edgar De la Cruz - Design Director
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
adamwilsher.com
Adam Wilsher - Freelance Designer / Art Director
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
aaronbloom.biz
Aaron Bloom — Design & Creative Direction
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.