Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to luca-schaefer.com

Luca Liam Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
lovajorm.com
Lova Jormfeldt - Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
asharnaveed.dev
Ashar Naveed | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ashleykircher.com
Ashley Kircher | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
mprohorov.com
Mihail Prohorov Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
julianabiasoto.com
Juliana Biasoto Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
jshearon.com
Jonathan Shearon - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
siniakoualex.com
Siniakou Alex Back-end, FullStackDeveloper
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sinarnusasolusi.com
Sinar Nusa Solusi: Sotfware Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sivalicon.com
Sivalicon | Best App Development Company
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
singhcode.com
Custom Software Development Company | SinghCode
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anniebartlett.dev
Annie Bartlett | Web Dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
silviawang.dev
Silvia Wang | Full Stack Dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abservices-06400.com
Amera BOUDIA | Ingénieur Devops
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
callummcneilage.me
Callum McNeilage
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrewjbenner.com
Andrew Benner's Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ashlynandjames.com
Ashlyn & James
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
aaryanverma.tech
Aaryan Verma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
1inbox.ai
1iNbox
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.